W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [snip] subqueries and datasets

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:57:06 +0100
Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <341BA1B7-CCC9-4E74-B7CD-A7871D6589AE@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
On 8 May 2009, at 17:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> Bijan Parsia wrote:
>> On 8 May 2009, at 16:02, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
>>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
>>>> Sent: 8 May 2009 05:41
>>>> To: SPARQL Working Group
>>>> Subject: [ISSUE-8] subqueries and datasets
>>>>
>>>> (Not sure if the email tag identifying the issue is useful. What  
>>>> do you
>>>> think?)
>>>
>>> A link at the top of the message is more valuable to me than the  
>>> tag in the form ISSUE-number.
>> The cool thing about using issue and action tags/mentions is that  
>> tracker keeps track of them:
>>  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8
>> I found this very handy in the OWL WG.
>
> whoa, awesome.
>
> does it handle any other syntax or did i just semi-accidentally  
> stumble on the right way of doing it?

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/email

Ya got lucky, punk :)

(Short answer: It doesn't have to be in the subject, the word ISSUE or  
ACTION has to be capitalized, and the form is (ISSUE|ACTION)-[0-9]+

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:57:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT