- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:38:34 -0400
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- CC: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > ... >> + comparing timezones vs. non-timezoned values in open-world/data-n >> tests (issue for EricP / AndyS ?) > > I think the comment has a point - there is something untoward here about > comparing dateTime or date with no time zone with one that does have a > time zone. (I would really like Eric to confirm or refute this in case > I've misread or not fount the right place to read in the XSF/F&O docs.) > > The solution is change the tests. If we want to be in picky mode, its > the result that change,; if we want to be relaxed, change the data so > comparisons are more than 14 hours apart. I like the latter solution. If someone can check it in to CVS and mark the test as not approved, we can approve it on Tuesday. Lee > > ... >> Lee > > Andy >
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 16:38:47 UTC