W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Agenda, 16 Jan 2007 @ 14:30 UTC

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:27:30 -0500
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF010AD206.78EE4AFE-ON85257264.001DDD75-85257264.001DFBB7@us.ibm.com>

A quiet week on the lists; our agenda remains our standing topics of the 
work towards rq25 and a test suite. Any other agenda items are welcome, as 


0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 16 January, 2007 
at 14:30:00 UTC
         + LeeF chairing
         + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
         + Scribe: Souri
         + Regrets: EliasT
         + roll call
         + approve 9 Jan minutes [2]
         + next meeting 23 Jan. Recruit scribe.
         + agenda comments?

1. Review ACTION Items

These action are DONE:


Let's check on the status of the following actions:

ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests
ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put 
ACTION: LeeF to check if SteveH can eyeball Jeen's first group of tests 
pre-WG approval (LeeF and iv_an_ru will also try to eyeball)
ACTION: PatH to change the entailment section around to talk about SPARQL 
first, then more general conditions in a normative appendix 

2. Test suite

Jeen test suite beginnings:

Lee: I haven't succeeded in getting in touch with Steve yet to review the 
initial tests. I did manage to review the tests myself:


2a. Continuation of discussion on syntax vs. evaluation tests

2b. Approving tests

The chair hopes to see consensus around approving these tests this week; 
if you can, please come prepared to discuss / decide on the syntax tests 
and triple-match tests.

2c. Testing abstract syntax?

[ed: Simon brought this up and it got a bit mixed in with the syntax vs. 
evaluation issue last week; also, Simon's audio was difficult to hear. 
Perhaps we can discuss it tomorrow to see where consensus lies.]

[ed: "Test suite" is a standing agendum; hopefully most weeks we'll have 
some tests that we can look at and approve as a group.]

3. rq25 status

We didn't really discuss this last week, though most of the details are in 

-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25.html
-> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25-algebra.html

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
Received on Monday, 15 January 2007 05:27:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:53 UTC