- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:24:46 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Lee Feigenbaum wrote: ... > 2. Test suite > > Jeen test suite beginnings: > -> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0007.html > > Lee: I haven't succeeded in getting in touch with Steve yet to review the > initial tests. I did manage to review the tests myself: > > -> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0019.html > > 2a. Continuation of discussion on syntax vs. evaluation tests > > 2b. Approving tests > > The chair hopes to see consensus around approving these tests this week; > if you can, please come prepared to discuss / decide on the syntax tests > and triple-match tests. The syntax tests in data-r2 are from SyntaxFull/ - but their a bit out of date. SyntaxDev/ has the complete set of syntax tests used for the grammar development. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0008.html Andy > > 2c. Testing abstract syntax? > > [ed: Simon brought this up and it got a bit mixed in with the syntax vs. > evaluation issue last week; also, Simon's audio was difficult to hear. > Perhaps we can discuss it tomorrow to see where consensus lies.]
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 11:25:17 UTC