See also: IRC log
AndyS_ DanC EliasT JosDeRoo Kendall_Clark LeeF SerT Souri Sven_Groppe ericP
<SerT> regrets, can't stay. I didn't realise the daylight saving time is not started for you guys
<kendallclark> scribe: Kendall Clark
bummer, SerT. I tried to look into that carefully; I thought the summer time wierdness didn't start until next week.
<kendallclark> it doesn't in the US start till this weekend, iirc
<SerT> my fault
<ericP> i'm sure there are politicians to blame for this policy
<ericP> are we scheduled to align with europe?
<SerT> can somebody forward me Peter's message http://firstname.lastname@example.org
<ericP> should i scribe this for kendall?
I guess so, SerT
<ericP> was just giving you a hard time
<kendallclark> i'm good
<ericP> (with a smile on my face)
<SerT> thanks Dan, c u
no, my mailer is in some wierd IMAP-lock-wierdness, state, SerT
<SerT> no rush, Dan, I just need it to keep the header references in my reply
there are mbox archives... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/mboxes/2006-03.mbx
(member-access for spam control reasons)
<SerT> got it, thanx
<LeeF> F.C.S is lacking, often.
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0465.html minutes 21 March
with 1 ammendment
<kendallclark> Minutes from 21 March, as amended, APPROVED
<kendallclark> Levity at the chair's expense! :)
PROPOSED: to meet again Tue, 4 Apr 2006, 14:30Z (Boston Tue 10:30 AM; Los Angeles Tue 7:30 AM; London Tue 3:30 PM; other local times);
<AndyS> Congrats to get the TZ right for London this week.
<ericP> oh all right
<LeeF> Regrets for next week
RESOLUTION: to meet Tue, 4 Apr 2006, 14:30Z, ericp to scribe
<kendallclark> EricP to scribe next week's meeting
<AndyS> AndyS / Regrets for next week
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to find email thread about wording of restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP; follow up on that to get text back into rq23 [WITHDRAWN] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-minutes.html#action01]
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from 2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard discussion [WITHDRAWN] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: SergioT to respond to 2005-09-18T15:02:48Z Peter F. Patel-Schneider [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-minutes.html#action03]
RESOLVED to postpone
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ 1.117 discharges KC's refs action to my satisfaction
# ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator, report results. [DONE]
<scribe> ACTION: KendallC to confirm that SPARQL WSDL query/queryrequest and maxOccurs do not need to be changed, despite Marsh's comment of 17Feb. [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-minutes.html#action04]
<kendallclark> but it's still true, Lee
# ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]. Note: the thread is closed as of 14 March
<Sven_Groppe> you cannot here me?
<Sven_Groppe> I write ..
<kendallclark> well, he can be a rational being with inconsistent belief set
<Sven_Groppe> Reto is satisfied with the last email correspondence
PROPOSED: to to advance SPARQL to
CR, and be willing to treat Fred's comments as new information
... to to advance SPARQL to CR, and be willing to treat Fred Zemke's comments as new information during CR
<kendallclark> Does anyone else in the WG agree w/ Oracle about these 6 and 4 comments not addressed?
<kendallclark> i.e., that they haven't been addressed?
<Sven_Groppe> I have to leave due to not recognizing the different daylight time changes of US and here.
PROPOSED: to to advance SPARQL to CR, contingent on confirmation from Fred Zemke
<scribe> ACTION: Souri to arrange a phone call with Fred Zemke and interested WG members (Andy + (DanC or EricP)) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-minutes.html#action05]
<LeeF> what's the current discussion about? i had to step away for a second
"I have been told by other members of DAWG that it is illegal to name the same dataset twice in FROM or FROM NAMED clauses of a query. "
<kendallclark> about what happens if a URI occurs >1 in a from or from named clause
<LeeF> ah, thanks
<kendallclark> sorry if i spoke over you eric
PROPOSED: to to advance SPARQL to
CR, contingent on confirmation from Fred Zemke
... to to advance SPARQL to CR, contingent on confirmation from Fred Zemke
so RESOLVED, FUB objecting
EricP: I'm in Paris
<AndyS> AndyS : +44 117 312 8181
<ericP> Souri, you can reach me at +1.617.395.1213 or my Japanese cell: +81.90.6533.3882
<LeeF> good luck, DanC!
<LeeF> and Andy
<LeeF> is ok
<EliasT> Thanks for your editing...
<scribe> ACTION: AndyS to review http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/json-sparql/ after early apr holiday, at earliest convenience [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-minutes.html#action06]
<kendallclark> propose to adjourn
<kendallclark> 2nd, Andy
<kendallclark> for danc: http://halogen.note.amherst.edu/%7Ejdtang/scheme_in_48/tutorial/overview.html
kendallclark, can you send minutes?
<kendallclark> danc: i was scribing in IRC
<kendallclark> can zakim generate minutes?