W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:58:44 -0600
Message-Id: <p06230914bff3201b6c13@[10.100.0.23]>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

>
>[NEW] ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically equivalent" 
>vs graph equivalent [recorded in 
>http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05]

I took over this action from Dan.

Change suggested to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html :

" A test passes if the graph from the action is logically equivalent 
to the graph named in the result. "Logical equivalence " can be 
tested by eliminating redundant bNodes in both graphs and testing if 
the graphs are isomorphic: same shape, same labels."
//
" A test passes if the graph from the action is <a 
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-graph-equality">equivalent</a>[RDF-CONCEPTS] 
to the graph named in the result. Equivalence can be tested by 
checking that the graphs are isomorphic and have identical IRI and 
literal nodes."

<<I deleted 'same labels' as it might imply a need for the same 
bnodeIDs to be used.>>

Other typos I noticed:

Open parenthesis (earlier in above paragraph) with no matching close.
superceeded /superceded
RDf/RDF
specificed/specified
achives/achieves




--

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 22:58:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT