W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:23:59 -0500
Message-Id: <54a785f63ceabb70e8fd9d5bb619b952@w3.org>
Cc: swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk, "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>

On Jan 17, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> [NEW] ACTION: DanC to review test README re "logically equivalent" vs  
>> graph equivalent [recorded in  
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05]
>
> I took over this action from Dan.

for which, thanks.

>
> Change suggested to  
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html :
>
> " A test passes if the graph from the action is logically equivalent  
> to the graph named in the result. "Logical equivalence " can be tested  
> by eliminating redundant bNodes in both graphs and testing if the  
> graphs are isomorphic: same shape, same labels."
> //
> " A test passes if the graph from the action is <a  
> href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-graph- 
> equality">equivalent</a>[RDF-CONCEPTS] to the graph named in the  
> result. Equivalence can be tested by checking that the graphs are  
> isomorphic and have identical IRI and literal nodes."

Looks good to me.

> <<I deleted 'same labels' as it might imply a need for the same  
> bnodeIDs to be used.>>
>
> Other typos I noticed:
>
> Open parenthesis (earlier in above paragraph) with no matching close.
> superceeded /superceded
> RDf/RDF
> specificed/specified
> achives/achieves
>
>


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 23:24:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT