W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Final text for Basic Graph Patterns

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:39:27 -0500
Message-Id: <62a611e18316dc5ffd46c5a9193583ab@w3.org>
Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>

On Jan 17, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> Let us agree that ANY wording we finish up with MUST support the same 
> results for basic SPARQL patterns, i.e. for the simple entailment 
> case.  In fact, I thought we had already agreed this some time ago.

Well, in a little-a agreement sense, yes, there does seem to be a 
critical mass of
support there.

But formally, I haven't put any question on rdfSemantics; I'm inclined 
to sort of
decide the whole thing at once, since pulling on any one little string 
in this
sort of thing seems quite likely to unravel large parts of it.

I'm hopeful that we do have an agreement in principle and that AndyS 
be able to capture it in the editor's draft and incorporate email 
in the next couple days and that this Thursday, I will be
able to do a sort of ceremonial "PROPOSED: that rq23 v1.xyz addresses
rdfSemantics; any objections? hearing none, so ordered."

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 21:39:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC