W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2006

Tests I think are incorrect

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:03:15 +0100
Message-Id: <2B35E5F9-5288-4671-87D8-E14A2301B07D@garlik.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

The following is a list of tests from my excuses file, was wondering  
if anyone else agrees that they don't match the spec:

Uses old syntax:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-001
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-002
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-003
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-source-simple-001
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-source-simple-002
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-source-simple-003
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-source-simple-004
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-source-simple-005
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple- 
pattern-001-oldsyntax
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple- 
pattern-002-oldsyntax
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple- 
pattern-003-oldsyntax
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple- 
pattern-004-oldsyntax
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#source-query-001
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#source-query-002
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#source-query-003
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#source-query-004
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#source-query-005
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#optional-and
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#optional-outer-and
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#optional-outer-and- 
with-bound

Spec gives different results:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedtype-ne-fail
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedtype-literal-ne
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#langmatches-3
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#langmatches-4
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sorting-one-of-one-column

Things I'm not quite sure about:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#typepromotion-decimal- 
decimal-pass
     Should promote to xsd:integer?

I've omitted all the spec-* tests as loads of them are missing data  
or broken in some way.

If other people agree these are broken, perhaps we could mark them as  
negative tests or remove them?

- Steve
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:03:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:26 GMT