W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: progress on WSDL 1.1 actions

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:55:48 -0500
To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1129323348.19638.78.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:52 -0400, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> 
> Hi Everyone, 
> 
> I've asked Kendall and Eric to review the latest draft of the WSDL 1.1
> Note and, of course, the WSDL itself now available at: 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wsdl11/ 
> 
> Kendall was able to give a "semi-cursory" thumbs-up to the WSDL before
> he had to go away this past week. 

That leaves Eric. He seems to be struggling to swap this in.

Can anybody else take a look at it and say "indeed, there's
nothing scary in there; I think it's OK to publish, as
a 1st draft"?


> I've also added a good bit of expository text at: 
> 
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SparqlProtocolWsdl11Examples 

Indeed!

I was hoping to play with some of the toys described there,
but I'm drowning in other stuff.

> This text links to a fully working Java sample client that executes
> SPARQL queries via SOAP over HTTP. It also explains how the code
> works. The sections on a python sample and a C# sample will hopefully
> be filled in this coming week. 
> 
> This partially satisfies: 
> 
> ACTION: Lee to elaborate on how to use this WSDL 1.1 stuff
> with tools 

It's done to my satisfaction.
> 
> ...but as I'm planning to fill in the python and C# parts of the Wiki
> page, I'd be happy to keep this action open for the time being. 
> 
> The other two relevant actions: 
> 
> ACTION: KC, EricP to review WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol
> publication candidate, once a candidate pointer is mailed to the WG
> 
> ACTION DanC: publish WSDL 1.1 sparql protocol note,
> contingent on thumbs-up from KC, EricP, Lee/Elias 
>
> are waiting on a thumbs-up from Eric and any other interested WG
> members.

I'll take a thumbs-up from Eric *or* any other interested WG member,
at this point.

>  Elias and I are OK with the current state of the Note, I believe, but
> would definitely appreciate any second (or third) sets of eyes. 
> 
> 
> hope everyone enjoy[s|ed] your weekends, 
> Lee
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 14 October 2005 20:55:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT