W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Aug

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:12:47 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1124147567.1045.555.camel@dirk>

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  2005-08-16T14:30Z
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=16&month=08&year=2005&hour=14&min=30&sec=0

  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/08/16-dawg-irc

scribe: SteveH or else EricP
  regrets?
  did KendallC say he's at risk this week?

  record for review:
Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2005-08-09 for review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JulSep/0243.html
 and ammendment from DanC

next meeting: 23 Aug? 30 Aug?
  DanC is not available 23 Aug
  chair? scribe?

continue the following without discussion:

ACTION: DanC to investigate having CVS commits send to the WG list
ACTION LeeF: draft WSDL 1.1 for SPARQL thingy with AndyS and Elias ETA 2 Sep
ACTION DanC: ask WSDL WG to review WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2 SPARQL protocol 
stuff,
once both are available

comments on agenda?

I'm running behind this week.

There are some new last call comments that I haven't really
even looked at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html

and I haven't thoroughly reviewed public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
traffic for agenda updates.


3. comment "Query forms should be resources, not operations"

ACTION KendallC: write another draft response to Mark Baker's comment 
and send to WG for possible discussion


4. Protocol testing

ACTION SteveH: elaborate "CONSTRUCT with content negotiation" into a 
test case

ACTION DanC: extract and machine-check examples
(ugh. no progress. :-( )


5. toward protocol last call

ACTION EricP: discuss conformance w.r.t. WSDL 2 with PLH and send some 
notes to
the WG, preferably including suggested text for conformance

ACTION KendallC: abstract/abbreviate http trace examples
seems to be done-ish

ACTION KendallC: fix d. ASK with simple RDF dataset...XML is wrong.

ACTION EricP: review protocol document 1.58

ACTION SteveH: review proto-wd after Friday signal from KC, hopefully in 
time for monday's agenda or tuesday's telcon
done-ish


how close to last call are we?


6. WSDL V2 last call

Any comments from the DAWG to WSDL folks?


7. "SPARQL Query Results XML Format: XML 1.1" comment

http://www.w3.org/mid/1123099748.20865.18.camel@localhost

ACTION DaveB: see if PLH would be satisfied with s/can/may/ in what he 
suggested


8. BASE IRI resolution comment

ACTION: ericP to add "don't normalize" to rq23 (perhaps supplied in
0096)
ACTION: EricP to add test in 0096 to rq23 tests. label "approved" and ref
http://www.w3.org/2005/07/26-dawg-minutes
ACTION: ericP to send [OK?] message to Bjoern


9. issues#queryMimeType

ACTION: ericP to update rq23 to include the text of rq23/mime.txt
reflect
security concearns


10. issues#valueTesting

ACTION DaveB: make 'XXI'^^:romanNumeral  = 21 and points nearby into 
test cases
(or ask questions in email).


11. issues#badIRIRef

ACTION AndyS: draft language re <foo###bar> errors
ACTION AndyS: Use IRI ref not RDF URI ref as world has moved on

(those are at least in progress)

12. test suite maintenance

ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on op:dateTime triple
ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve
ACTION: SteveH to review the relevant test case re: IRI normalization ref
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/28-dawg-minutes#item06
ACTION: AndyS to add the above graph test cases (analagous to valueTesting
test cases) (don't expect quick delivery) ref
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#item05



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 15 August 2005 23:12:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:24 GMT