- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:44:15 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 18:22 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > In http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ > $Revision: 1.52 $ of $Date: 2005/07/26 17:11:25 $ > After "PROPOSED: to note that the .xsd is derived from the .rng (and > therefore, as far as we know, they mean the same thing) and make them > both normative" > > Done. See Section 4. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#schemas Very well. > After "PROPOSED: to change the namespace name to > http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results# (and update rf1 and rq23)" > and > ACTION DaveB: update rf1 with new namespace > (which is http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results# ) > > Done. Also updated all the schemas and examples. > See section 3. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#examples > and section 4. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#schemas Right. looks good. > ACTION DaveB: to choose a term and define it > (for the document itself) > > Done. It's at the start of section 2. and has anchor defn-srd > for the term "SPARQL Results Document" > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/#defn-srd It doesn't actually define the term; i.e. it doesn't use the conformance language from relax-ng: "... determine for any XML document and for any correct RELAX NG schema whether the document is valid with respect to the schema." -- http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20011203.html#conformance Perhaps... A SPARQL results document is an XML document that is valid with respect to the relax NG schema in section @@. I'm not sure whether a relax-NG schema file is a relax-NG schema. I know there's an indirection in XSD. Since we decided result2.xsd is normative too, we need a normative reference to XSD. I can't find the part of the XML Schema spec that says how to say that a document matches a schema. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#validation_outcome Maybe it's not worth the bother; maybe it's clear enough what a SPARQL Results Document is. But do add the normative reference to /TR/xmlschema-1/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 15:44:29 UTC