- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:39:08 -0600
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 23:48 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: [...] > > 10.4 yes or no > "Align results to XML results format" > > Did we decide this? I feel there might be a dropped for me action here > somewhere. I/we neglected to assign actions arising from a number of decisions in Helsinki, including this one: "RESOLVED: to add explicit yes/no in result set; keep boolean in protocol spec; keep ASK syntax and section 10.4 Asking "yes or no" questions as from v1.33 17-Nov-04 and later version of the QL spec; DanC, SteveH abstaining." http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item11 I went looking for another one of your actions earlier today, and found it was overtaken by a WG decision... "PROPOSED: order in result set is: if SELECT a,b, c then a,b,c; if SELECT * then unconstrained. so RESOLVED. SteveH abstaining" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/att-0084/DAWG-Teleconference-1-Feb-2005.html#item06 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 00:39:10 UTC