- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:26:19 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 18:39 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 23:48 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: > [...] > > > > 10.4 yes or no > > "Align results to XML results format" > > > > Did we decide this? I feel there might be a dropped for me action here > > somewhere. > > I/we neglected to assign actions arising from a number of decisions > in Helsinki, including this one: > > "RESOLVED: to add explicit yes/no in result set; keep boolean in > protocol spec; keep ASK syntax and section 10.4 Asking "yes or no" > questions as from v1.33 17-Nov-04 and later version of the QL spec; > DanC, SteveH abstaining." > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item11 OK, noted, will think about it. > I went looking for another one of your actions earlier today, > and found it was overtaken by a WG decision... > > "PROPOSED: order in result set is: if SELECT a,b, c then a,b,c; if > SELECT * then unconstrained. so RESOLVED. SteveH abstaining" > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/att-0084/DAWG-Teleconference-1-Feb-2005.html#item06 I updated the editor's draft of the VBR last night to add the latter. Changed 2.2 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ CVS 1.17+ Dave
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 16:26:36 UTC