Re: ACTION op:dateTime triple [Was: Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review]

Jos,

our original example had a typo - the day part of the xsd:dateTime 
literal need to be fixed (also our public example has been updated and 
our code behind checking that)

please update your examples with

	s/2000-06-00T00:00:00Z/2000-06-01T00:00:00Z/


cheers

Alberto

On Feb 16, 2005, at 1:22 AM, jos.deroo@agfa.com wrote:

>
> | ACTION JosD: make 2 test cases using the same query but with
> | different data: one without an op:dateTime triple in the input,
> | and one with.
>
> The same query is
>
> PREFIX ical: <http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#>
> PREFIX op: <http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions#>
> SELECT ?uri ?summary ?dtstart
> FROM <http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2004/04test/icalD001>
> WHERE
>         (?uri ical:summary ?summary)
>         (?uri ical:dtstart ?dtstart)
>         (?dtstart op:dateTime-greater-than "2000-06-00T00:00:00Z")
>
> (which I tested with N3 notation in
> http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2004/04test/icalQ001.n3
> http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2004/04test/icalQ002.n3)
>
>
> The data for test case 1 is
>
> :test ical:summary "testing SPARQL".
> :test ical:dtstart "2005-02-15T00:00:00Z".
>
> (see http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2004/04test/icalD001.n3)
>
> and we get back no results.
>
>
> The additional data for test case 2 is the triple
> { ?A^^xsd:dateTime math:greaterThan ?B^^xsd:dateTime }
> => { ?A op:dateTime-greater-than ?B }.
>
> (see http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2004/04test/icalR.n3)
>
> and then we get back
>
> ?uri    ?summary           ?dtstart
> =================================================
> :test   "testing SPARQL"   "2005-02-15T00:00:00Z"
>
> (see http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2004/04test/icalE002.n3)
>
>
> -- 
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
>
-
Alberto Reggiori, @Semantics S.R.L.
www.asemantics.com

Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2005 08:41:51 UTC