W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 15 Feb

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:05:50 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1108393550.4991.310.camel@localhost>

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda


  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/02/15-dawg-irc

scribe: Dave Beckett

record for review:
Minutes of 2005-02-08 Telecon for review

next meeting: 22 Feb. scribe?

note the following done without discussion:

ACTION: KendallC to Announce the protocol spec
 (I haven't seen pointers, but I heard from Kendall that this is done.)

continue the following without discussion:
ACTION: DanC to ask Liam, via SemWeb CG, which XML groups might be
interested in SPARQL result set WD
ACTION: KendallC: to propose a solution to protocolRootReferent
ACTION: SteveH to to propose tests for str() and =~
ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named graphs
ACTION: DanC: suggest formal definitions for SOURCE
ACTION: DaveB: discuss warnings in result set spec
ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve

comments on agenda?
(this time it's rushed, rather than being quite so late.)

2. ftf6

Sorry, ftf6 agenda is late.

ACTION: DanC to consider Asemantics hosting proposal w.r.t. WG schedule
ACTION: SteveH to propose to host in Southampton right after XTech
ACTION: PatH to propose to host in Florida

I would have liked to get my head around those sooner. Let's decided
during ftf6.

3. valueTesting, XSCH

ACTION: EricP and PathH will review XSCH draft document
CONTINUED (with progress)

ACTION: SteveH to review <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#tests>

ACTION: JosD to review <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#tests>

4. SPARQL QL pub

ACTION: EricP to to update rq23 w.r.t. BOUND/UNSAID
ACTION: EricP, make sure editor's draft as an inline issue (to be published) that we need to work this out

Minor Syntax issues Seaborne, Andy (Friday, 11 February)

5. Service Descriptions

ACTION: SteveH to Write up a service description of features supported for his service

ACTION: KendallC to to think about predicate to relate html-forms and svc descriptions, and how this goes into the spec
ACTION: KendallC to Add section for service descriptions and put graph specifying in it to start it off
ACTION: KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec.
ACTION: DanC to Write up definitive service concept
ACTION: DanC to write up "sparqlParam" approach (reply to kendallC)
ACTION: DanC to discuss accessingCollections in service description context
ACTION: EricP: to inviestigate WSDL/SOAP encodings of SPARQL protocol

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 14 February 2005 15:05:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC