W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Review. Clarification - Section 2.1 result forms

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:39:23 +0100
Message-ID: <42AD7E7B.4020500@hp.com>
To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



Steve Harris wrote:
> The text says:
> 
> Results can be returned in RDF, in XML with the SPARQL Variable Binding
> Results XML Format [16] and also in forms specific to implementation APIs.
> 
> I'm not that this reads correctly (gramatically speaking), but to me it
> implies that variable binding results can be returned in RDF, CONSTRUCT
> has not been introduced yet. "and also in..." is redundant really, but I
> guess it doesnt hurt.
> 
> Suggestion: drop "in RDF" and qualify:
> 
> Variable binding results can be returned in XML with the SPARQL Variable
> Binding Results XML Format [16] and also in forms specific to
> implementation APIs.
> 
> - Steve
> 

Removed mention of RDF form and of APIs.

"""
Results can be returned in XML using the SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML 
Format [16].
"""

	Andy
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 12:39:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:23 GMT