On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 07:16, Kendall Clark wrote: > I find many of these comments to be unhelpful, but we should probably > consider them anyway: > > http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/view/182 "Some committee There are only 2 editors of the draft. And one of them works for HP, and might therefore be biassed. BRQL indeed looks a lot like RDQL." How many editors would they expect? 4 hands seems like the right number, to me. And I think it's a *feature* that most of the design happens outside/before the WG. I think we're doing collaborative design review, not collaborative design from scratch. I wonder if you share those sentiments and would please relay them, Kendall. I'm not likely to manage yet another account to join that discussion. Hmm... I might try to capture my thoughts as collaboration patterns, near http://esw.w3.org/topic/ConnectingAudiences -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 15:32:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT