W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: Querying multipl sources objective

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:01:24 -0500
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group ' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1091469684.4845.80.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 12:57, Jim Hendler wrote:
> At 11:53 -0500 8/2/04, Dan Connolly wrote:
> >On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 11:40, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> >>  Dan,
> >>
> >>  If it comes to a vote on this, I am going to vote along the lines of
> >>  Jim Hendler and AndyS.  I don't think that we need to added complexity
> >>  in the spec at this time.  So you have my position on this.
> >
> >Umm... well, I can't tell what edits JimH and/or AndyS are proposing.
> >Sorry if I'm reading too fast or something.
> >
> >--
> >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> 
> Dan - I won't speak for anyone else, if forced to go with something 
> right now, my proposal would be to include objective 4.5 but remove 
> 4.5.1.  However, I like Kendall's suggestion of leaving both in the 
> current WD and soliciting feedback during review - if we were moving 
> to LC or such I'd worry more, but for a next WD, this seems like an 
> appropriate action to take.

OK, I think that's the course we're on currently.

>   -JH
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 2 August 2004 14:01:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT