- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:57:20 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Cc: "'RDF Data Access Working Group '" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
At 11:53 -0500 8/2/04, Dan Connolly wrote: >On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 11:40, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: >> Dan, >> >> If it comes to a vote on this, I am going to vote along the lines of >> Jim Hendler and AndyS. I don't think that we need to added complexity >> in the spec at this time. So you have my position on this. > >Umm... well, I can't tell what edits JimH and/or AndyS are proposing. >Sorry if I'm reading too fast or something. > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ Dan - I won't speak for anyone else, if forced to go with something right now, my proposal would be to include objective 4.5 but remove 4.5.1. However, I like Kendall's suggestion of leaving both in the current WD and soliciting feedback during review - if we were moving to LC or such I'd worry more, but for a next WD, this seems like an appropriate action to take. -JH -- Professor James Hendler http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Received on Monday, 2 August 2004 13:57:58 UTC