W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: BRQL spec

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:00:26 +0100
To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "'Eric Prud'hommeaux'" <eric@w3.org>
Cc: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000801c465ef$629c3510$0a01a8c0@atlas>

> Ah... so you (and Andy?) are making progress along the lines
> you mentioned at the end of the telcon this week. Nifty!

I looked at EricP's document and it looked good.  I also did some testcases
as per telcon:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0044.html

Only three OPTIONALs testcases but the basic framework is in place now -
comments most welcome.  I may have time to get a nice web page together but
don't count on it - sorry.  For now, the email will have to do.

	Andy

-------- Original Message --------
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <>
> Date: 09 July 2004 20:14
> 
> On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 04:26, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > I took the RDQL submission [1] and the RDQL-BRQL delta [2] and started
> > assembing a strawman spec [3].
> 
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/07/08-BRQL/
> 
> Ah... so you (and Andy?) are making progress along the lines
> you mentioned at the end of the telcon this week. Nifty!
> 
> I cited it from the agenda in a few places.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2
>  $Revision: 1.21 $
> 
> I don't have any way to secure a commitment from the WG to
> read this spec between now and the ftf meeting, but I think
> it's consistent with the data we gathered in the WBS initial
> design poll, so I encourage WG members to read it and send
> feedback at their earliest convenience.
> 
> 
> >  I'll fill flush it out a bit and provide
> > an appendix with test cases in the next few days.
> 
> Yes, I'd like any question I put to the WG about
> an initial design to include at least a handful of test
> cases in concrete form.
> 
> That means pasting them
> right into the appendix, please. If you must link
> to them, make it very clear which links are
> to resources that are part of the proposal vs.
> just handy nearby things.
> 
> 
> 
> >  The grammar and some
> > other details are informed by an implementation [4]. A couple example
> > queries and results are available [5,6,7]. You may have to force your
> > browser to use UTF-8. I need to kick the cvsweb server a bit to make
> > it pay attention to character coding.
> > 
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-RDQL-20040109/ [2]
> > 
> http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/BRQL/BRQL-description.html#Triple_
> Matching_Features [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/07/08-BRQL/
> [4] http://www.w3.org/1999/02/26-modules/dist/Federate-1.tar.gz
> [5]
>
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/perl/modules/W3C/Rdf/test/BRQL0-alg.sh?rev=HEAD&con
tent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
> [6]
>
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/perl/modules/W3C/Rdf/test/BRQL1-alg.sh?rev=HEAD&con
tent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
> [7]
>
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/perl/modules/W3C/Rdf/test/BRQL2-alg.sh?rev=HEAD&con
tent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 9 July 2004 16:00:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT