W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnai re

From: Thompson, Bryan B. <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:17:31 -0400
Message-Id: <D24D16A6707B0A4B9EF084299CE99B39053F8C74@mcl-its-exs02.mail.saic.com>
To: 'Dan Connolly ' <connolly@w3.org>, "'Thompson, Bryan B. '" <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
Cc: 'RDF Data Access Working Group ' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, "'graham.moore@empolis.net'" <graham.moore@empolis.net>

Dan,

I saw Graham Moore present on a SOAP binding last year at XML.  I've
Cc'd him.  I also know that he is working on SNAPI (Semantic Net API),
which is similar to the RDF Net API.

Graham - are there detailed specifications for a SOAP binding?

-bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly
To: Thompson, Bryan B.
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group
Sent: 7/2/2004 2:27 PM
Subject: RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnai
re

On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 05:44, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> Dan,
> 
> I actually support my own protocol proposal, which is the XPointer
> approach using the HTTP Range header for subresource addressing.  I'd
> appreciate some space in which people could vote on this in relation
> to other protocol proposals.

Ah yes; quite. I was mostly working on designs that had been
evaluated, but we've had very little evaluation of protocol
designs.

I added it to the protocol question.
  http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/

Please update your answer, Brian (and others, if you like).

>   I also think that it is important to give
> people options for some other proposals (e.g., SOAP binding of RDFNet
> API,

I don't recall seeing a design like that. Got a pointer handy?

>  etc.)

pointers?

> -bryan

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 15:17:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT