W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnai re

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:27:21 -0500
To: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1088792840.21030.2467.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 05:44, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> Dan,
> 
> I actually support my own protocol proposal, which is the XPointer
> approach using the HTTP Range header for subresource addressing.  I'd
> appreciate some space in which people could vote on this in relation
> to other protocol proposals.

Ah yes; quite. I was mostly working on designs that had been
evaluated, but we've had very little evaluation of protocol
designs.

I added it to the protocol question.
  http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/

Please update your answer, Brian (and others, if you like).

>   I also think that it is important to give
> people options for some other proposals (e.g., SOAP binding of RDFNet
> API,

I don't recall seeing a design like that. Got a pointer handy?

>  etc.)

pointers?

> -bryan

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 14:27:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:20 GMT