- From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:51:25 +0100
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 22, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Patrick Stickler wrote: > I guess we could have a classification of issues/use cases which are > out of scope but "near by" and hence not be completely > ignored/dismissed. +1 I agree - we should end up soonish with an issues' list containing also most of these possible extensions and additional requirements for later consideration by the WG. > Inference/reasoning capabilities of knowledge stores seems like another > such "near by" issue, where we may not address it normatively, but we > may need to provide some discussion and possibly some non-normative > guidance. yes - that's another good one which needs to be addressed at some time; even though it is not on the top on my wishlist at the moment :) Alberto
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 05:51:28 UTC