W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 11 May

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 20:58:04 +0100
To: "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001901c436c9$1d6dd480$0a01a8c0@atlas>

> Comments on today's agenda?
> Are there specific proposals for requirements that I've
> missed? especially any where email traffic shows at least
> some support and no outstanding objections?

There is proposal0283:
[[ Support for a subset of XSD Datatypes

The query language design must identify a set of XSD datatypes and
operations on these datatypes.  Test case of queries involving datatype
operations will be developed.
]]

With title from 0285 and one support in 0299

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0283.html

	Andy


-------- Original Message --------
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <>
> Date: 10 May 2004 16:55
> 
> 1. convene, take roll, review record, agenda
> 
>  RDF Data Access Working Group  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 
>  Tuesdays 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC
>  Zakim Bridge tel:+1.617.761.6200 , conference 7333 ("RDFD")
> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
>  supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
> 	log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/05/11-dawg-irc
> 
> scribe: Dave Beckett
> 
> Roll call: see WG membership at
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
> 
> PROPOSED: to accept
> 
>  Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-05-04 for review
>  From: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
>  Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 11:05:04 -0700
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun
> /0330.html 
> 
> as a true record of our last meeting.
> 
> next telcon is scheduled for Tue, 18 Apr.
>   NOTE WELL: chair has a conflict
>   scribe volunteer?
> 
> 
> misc actions from Amsterdam:
> ACTION DanC: inform the TAG of the conflict between sec13.9
> of the HTTP spec and TAG's recommendation on issue 7
> 
> misc actions from 4May:
> ACTION: EricP to set up a public comment list, and to work
> with DanC to choose a name for it
> 
> Comments on today's agenda?
> Are there specific proposals for requirements that I've
> missed? especially any where email traffic shows at least
> some support and no outstanding objections?
> 
> 
> 
> 2. Requirements: 3.1 Multi-edged Paths
> 
> DONE: Andy Seaborne and Jean-François to rewrite 3.1
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun
> /0248.html 
> 
> proposal0248: [[
> 3.1 Multiple RDF triple matching
> 
> The query langauge must include the capability to restrict
> matches on the RDF graph by providing more than one RDF
> triple pattern to be satisified in one query. ]]
> 
> proposal0261: [[
>   The query language must include the capability to restrict matches
>   by graph pattern on the queried graph by providing a graph pattern.
>   The graph pattern may consist of one, two or more RDF
> triple patterns,
>   to be satisfied in one query.
> ]]
> 
> 
> proposal0269: [[
> The query language must include the capability to restrict
> matches on a queried graph by providing a graph pattern, which may
> consist of one or more RDF triple patterns, to be satisfied in one
> query. ]]
> 
> 
> 3. Requirement 3.2 Variable Binding Results
> 
> DONE: Pat Hayes to summarize query/binding experience from
> DQL  summary of OWL-QL experiences
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun
> /0245.html 

I'd like Pat to talk thru this message a bit.


4. Requirement 3.4 Subgraph Results

DONE: EricP to write up implemention experience for 3.4
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0260.html 

ACTION: Steve Harris to express objections to 3.4


5. Use Cases Draft
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases
  v 1.39 or better

ACTION: RobS to generate some RDF for the use cases

ACTION: Kendall and Alberto to work on section 5.1.3 of this document


6. additional use cases

ACTION DaveB: write up this educational metadata UC

ACTION Yoshio: to write up "Kate finds an article and wants to find
related programs..." 

Browsing Example - tell me about X, ACTION Steve Harris

Bandwidth Efficiency - bytesize of resultset, ACTION SteveH

ACTION Janne: write a use case to motivate the requirement of having
queries written in RDF. (WITHDRAWN?) 


7. Test materials

ACTION SteveH: to draft and maintain a list of test sketch cases,
including x < y, x < 18. 



--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the WWW2004 in NY 15-21 May?
Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 15:58:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT