W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:25:17 -0400
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040505152517.GA1630@monkeyfist.com>

On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:13:09AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:

> changing graph. So I'd suggest that we choose a phrase like 'server' 
> (or 'source' or 'base' or 'answer' or some such) and use it 
> consistently as a name and as a qualifier, as in 'server graph', 
> meaning the notional RDF graph used by the server to answer the query.

The problem with "server graph" is that we adopted a requirement that
the query language can work w/out network support. Hence my suggested
"queried graph"; "source graph" also seems a credible choice. 

But yr point about "*the* RDF graph", given the possibility of
distributed or federated queries, is a good one. As is the point about
naming and consistent use. 

Best,
Kendall Clark
--
Habitation creates space; space only exists because we do.
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:26:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT