W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Various result forms

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 16:18:38 +0100
Message-ID: <E864E95CB35C1C46B72FEA0626A2E808028A3435@0-mail-br1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org



-------- Original Message --------
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <>
> Date: 5 May 2004 16:08
> 
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:20:27PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > 
> > To try to put requirements 3.2 (Variable Binding Results) and 3.5
> > (Subgraph Results) in some kind of context ...
> > 
> > There are a number of result forms that people have used or
> > suggested:  I know of: 
> > 
> > 1/ Variable bindings
> >    Common for the case of get data out of RDF
> > 
> > 2/ Result set in RDF
> >    As 1/ - encoded in RDF
> > 
> > 3/ RDF=>XHTML/XML
> 
> Is this intended to convey a graph construncted from the variable
> binding results?
> 
> - Steve

No, it is not intended to include RDF syntax generation in RDF/XML.  It is
intended to create a displayable web page (XHTML) or a SOAP message in XML.
No RDF graph - its not syntax generating, and no (recoverable) variable
bindings.  The use is to feed into something else like a web browser or web
service.

	Andy
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:19:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT