- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 12:13:25 -0500
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
>On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:13:09AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > >> changing graph. So I'd suggest that we choose a phrase like 'server' >> (or 'source' or 'base' or 'answer' or some such) and use it >> consistently as a name and as a qualifier, as in 'server graph', >> meaning the notional RDF graph used by the server to answer the query. > >The problem with "server graph" is that we adopted a requirement that >the query language can work w/out network support. Ah, I forgot that. OK. >Hence my suggested >"queried graph"; "source graph" also seems a credible choice. >But yr point about "*the* RDF graph", given the possibility of >distributed or federated queries, is a good one. As is the point about >naming and consistent use. > >Best, >Kendall Clark >-- >Habitation creates space; space only exists because we do. Hey, tell that to the stars. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:15:23 UTC