W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 12:13:25 -0500
Message-Id: <p06001f08bcbed09dadbb@[]>
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

>On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:13:09AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>  changing graph. So I'd suggest that we choose a phrase like 'server'
>>  (or 'source' or 'base' or 'answer' or some such) and use it
>>  consistently as a name and as a qualifier, as in 'server graph',
>>  meaning the notional RDF graph used by the server to answer the query.
>The problem with "server graph" is that we adopted a requirement that
>the query language can work w/out network support.

Ah, I forgot that. OK.

>Hence my suggested
>"queried graph"; "source graph" also seems a credible choice.
>But yr point about "*the* RDF graph", given the possibility of
>distributed or federated queries, is a good one. As is the point about
>naming and consistent use.
>Kendall Clark
>Habitation creates space; space only exists because we do.

Hey, tell that to the stars.


IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:15:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:43 UTC