W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Requirement 3.1 rewording

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 12:13:25 -0500
Message-Id: <p06001f08bcbed09dadbb@[10.0.100.76]>
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

>On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:13:09AM -0500, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
>>  changing graph. So I'd suggest that we choose a phrase like 'server'
>>  (or 'source' or 'base' or 'answer' or some such) and use it
>>  consistently as a name and as a qualifier, as in 'server graph',
>>  meaning the notional RDF graph used by the server to answer the query.
>
>The problem with "server graph" is that we adopted a requirement that
>the query language can work w/out network support.

Ah, I forgot that. OK.

>Hence my suggested
>"queried graph"; "source graph" also seems a credible choice.
>But yr point about "*the* RDF graph", given the possibility of
>distributed or federated queries, is a good one. As is the point about
>naming and consistent use.
>
>Best,
>Kendall Clark
>--
>Habitation creates space; space only exists because we do.

Hey, tell that to the stars.

Pat




-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:15:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:19 GMT