Andreas Eberhart has posted a message to the rdf-logic list (in fact, attempted to cross-post it to just about every RDF-related list) which I feel is somewhat counter-productive to the work of this group: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2004Apr/0063.html I'm not sure what the consensus view on this kind of stuff is. I think the last thing we want is for other RDF groups to be arguing about what a query language should be under the assumption that we're hearing their input when we're clearly not (the attempted cross-post to our mailing list didn't seem to go through). I'm also a bit irked about surveys that don't include the REX language; I realize I haven't put together enough resources to make it accessible (hoping to at least post a summary of the f2f presentation this weekend), but I really don't have the time to be writing comprehensive documentation and language tutorials in more than one forum.Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:58:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:56 GMT