W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: A Comparison of RDF Query Languages

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:56:27 -0400
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040428185627.GA1921@monkeyfist.com>

On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote:

> I'm not sure what the consensus view on this kind of stuff is. I think
> the last thing we want is for other RDF groups to be arguing about what
> a query language should be under the assumption that we're hearing their
> input when we're clearly not (the attempted cross-post to our mailing
> list didn't seem to go through).

Just to add another data point, I'm finding this report extremely
useful, both in editing our UC&R doc and as a member of the WG
thinking about where to start, what other tech requirements to
propose, and so on.

> I'm also a bit irked about surveys that don't include the REX language;
> I realize I haven't put together enough resources to make it accessible
> (hoping to at least post a summary of the f2f presentation this
> weekend), but I really don't have the time to be writing comprehensive
> documentation and language tutorials in more than one forum.

Is there anything about REX on the Web?

Kendall Clark
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:58:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:43 UTC