W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2012

RE: Default and named datasets in federated queries

From: Peter Waher <Peter.Waher@clayster.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:25:10 +0000
To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
CC: "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1693EFE1FD641C42A0D542FCBC732DE698A0CA63@EX3.YODA.UTOPIA.LOCAL>
Hello Axel.
You response answers my questions.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Peter Waher

-----Original Message-----
From: Polleres, Axel [mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com]
Sent: den 3 oktober 2012 11:14
To: Peter Waher; cbuilaranda@gmail.com; public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: Default and named datasets in federated queries

Dear Peter,

I have added an item linking to your mail to consider implementation experience of specifying datasets for federated query to our http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Future_Work_Items list (where the group collects suggestions for future work).

I'd appreciate if you could briefly confirm that this answers your concern.

Best regards,
Axel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Waher [mailto:Peter.Waher@clayster.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 03. Oktober 2012 16:15
> To: Carlos Buil Aranda; public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Default and named datasets in federated queries
>
> Hello Carlos
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Will the issue be kept and raised automatically when work on the next 
> version commences? Or do I need to raise this issue again for the next 
> version?
>
> Otherwise, my question has been answered.
>
> Sincerely,
> Peter Waher
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Buil Aranda [mailto:cbuilaranda@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 3 oktober 2012 09:43
> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org; Peter Waher
> Subject: RE: Default and named datasets in federated queries
>
> Dear Peter,
> The Working Group has considered your comments about allowing FROM and 
> FROM NAMED clauses after the SERVICE clause but we've opted for the 
> current design for simplicity and due to a lack of implementation 
> experience.
> Along these lines, the group will investigate more about how datasets 
> will/can interact with the new federated query form as the community 
> gets more implementation experience. Based on this, a future SPARQL-WG 
> will be able to consider your comments in more depth. Unfortuantely, 
> the Working Group has very tight deadlines and there is not much time 
> left to design and implement substantive changes to the specification 
> now.
> We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has 
> been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.
> Carlos, on behalf of the SPARQL WG
>
>
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2012 18:25:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 6 October 2012 18:25:41 GMT