Re: comments on SPARQL 1.1 14 October 2010 Working Draft

> Just a few picky copy editing things:
>
> - http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#matchingRDFLiterals has the line
> "This RDF data is the data graph for the query examples in sections
> 2.3.1–2.3.3," but there is no section 2.3.3. I later noticed that 2.3
> has three subsections, but that they're numbered 2.3.1, 2.3.1, and 2.3.3.

This is because the editors were waiting for the numbering to become 
stable as the document.

The repeated 2.3.1 was a XML nesting error - now fixed.

> - The errata and previous errata links at the beginning of the document
> don't go anywhere.

These will be put in place in the final version - for now, I've made 
sure they point to possible names.

> - The use of the term "data type" should be normalized as either two
> words or one word throughout.

Done - "datatype" had more occurrences, so I've changed the other 
occurrences to that form.

>
> Bob

Thank you for your comments,

     Andy

Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 10:38:04 UTC