comments on SPARQL 1.1 14 October 2010 Working Draft from Bob DuCharme on 2011-01-12 (public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from January 2011)

From: Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:56:59 -0500
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <4D2D0A6B.7090702@snee.com>

Just a few picky copy editing things:

- http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#matchingRDFLiterals has the line 
"This RDF data is the data graph for the query examples in sections 
2.3.1–2.3.3," but there is no section 2.3.3. I later noticed that 2.3 
has three subsections, but that they're numbered 2.3.1, 2.3.1, and 2.3.3.

- The errata and previous errata links at the beginning of the document 
don't go anywhere.

- The use of the term "data type" should be normalized as either two 
words or one word throughout.

Bob

Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 01:56:24 UTC