Geoff, I have fixed the dateTimes and also the manifest problem in your other message. Thanks Andy Geoff Chappell wrote: > I notice in a few test cases - e.g: > > sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-0 > sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-1 > > that seemingly invalid dateTimes are used: > > xsd:dateTime("2005-01-01T00:00Z") > > (i.e. seconds aren't optional are they?) > > Is this an error in the test case or does it imply that the xsd:dateTime > function is supposed to be liberal in what it accepts? > > Also, BTW, I think those particular two tests would be clearer if they > didn't used bnodes as subjects. > > - Geoff > >Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 12:55:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:48 GMT