W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > May 2005

Test cases

From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:39:05 -0400
To: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009001c5606e$56658510$6401a8c0@gsclaptop>

I notice in a few test cases - e.g:

	sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-0
	sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-1	

that seemingly invalid dateTimes are used:

	xsd:dateTime("2005-01-01T00:00Z")

(i.e. seconds aren't optional are they?)

Is this an error in the test case or does it imply that the xsd:dateTime
function is supposed to be liberal in what it accepts?

Also, BTW, I think those particular two tests would be clearer if they
didn't used bnodes as subjects.

- Geoff
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 14:39:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:48 GMT