W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: Test cases

From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 10:14:26 -0400
To: <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00dc01c56134$1054e540$6401a8c0@gsclaptop>

Thanks, Andy, those work better now :-)

BTW, I have a few differing results with some tests that involve unbound
vars in filters. Would you like me to report my differences now or things
still in flux in that area?

Best,

Geoff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seaborne, Andy [mailto:andy.seaborne@hp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:56 AM
> To: Geoff Chappell
> Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Test cases
> 
> Geoff,
> 
> I have fixed the dateTimes and also the manifest problem in your other
> message.
> 
> 	Thanks
> 	Andy
> 
> 
> Geoff Chappell wrote:
> > I notice in a few test cases - e.g:
> >
> > 	sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-0
> > 	sparql-query-example-Testing-Values-1
> >
> > that seemingly invalid dateTimes are used:
> >
> > 	xsd:dateTime("2005-01-01T00:00Z")
> >
> > (i.e. seconds aren't optional are they?)
> >
> > Is this an error in the test case or does it imply that the xsd:dateTime
> > function is supposed to be liberal in what it accepts?
> >
> > Also, BTW, I think those particular two tests would be clearer if they
> > didn't used bnodes as subjects.
> >
> > - Geoff
> >
> >
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 14:14:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:48 GMT