[Ok?] Re: SPARQL Protocol comments (editorial)

On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Arjohn Kampman wrote:

>
> (comments are on the current editor's draft, revision 1.76)

Arjohn,

As of the latest editor's draft, 1.81, (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ 
DataAccess/proto-wd/), I believe yr comments are addressed, to wit:

> The HTTP-POST example (section 2.2.1.11) seems to be malformed: the  
> key
> of the query parameter is part of the URL but the parameter value is
> part of the request body.

Corrected. See 2.2.1.11.

> Further, there are some spelling errors in the document:
> - "compatability" (in Introduction)
> - "consumpution" (twice in section 2.1.4)
> - "negotation" (in title of section 2.2.1.3)

Also corrected.

Do these changes address yr concerns? Thanks for yr help with this spec.

Cheers,
Kendall