Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/

On May 9, 2010, at 05:49 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:

> * Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> [2010-05-08 18:32-0500]
>> I'm guessing everybody is suppose to send their reviews by email, right?
> 
> Yep, textual suggestions which we can evaluate as a group, à la
> 
> - Using traditional RDB2RDF translation methods the RDF
> - representation for the two example tables coming from two
>  different databases is shown below:
> 
> + RDB2RDF translation methods allow us to merged data from

- RDB2RDF translation methods allow us to merged data from

+ RDB2RDF translation methods allow us to merge data from

> + different databases. The RDF representation for two tables from
>  different databases is shown below:


:-)

(I'll try to send my other comments/suggestions piecemeal, as
the larger chunks aren't coming together fast enough.)

Ted



--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers

Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 14:08:36 UTC