- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 17:49:15 -0400
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
* Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> [2010-05-08 18:32-0500] > I'm guessing everybody is suppose to send their reviews by email, right? Yep, textual suggestions which we can evaluate as a group, à la - Using traditional RDB2RDF translation methods the RDF - representation for the two example tables coming from two different databases is shown below: + RDB2RDF translation methods allow us to merged data from + different databases. The RDF representation for two tables from different databases is shown below: or + 2.7 UC7 - Sharing federation descriptions + + A researcher has isolated a pulmonary disfunction associated with a + defect in a rat gene. She wants to find homologous genes in humans and + search for (human) patients with appropriate symptoms. She issues a + query to a federating query engine, which segments the query into + patterns appropriate to an rCAD and a clinical database. + + A Mapping from relational data defines an RDF interface graph. Sharing + this definition allows federating query engines to direct queries to + appropriate endpoints. > Just a quick reminder that we should do this (including myself) in the next > two days :) And I'll try to stay on top of the suggestions as they come in. > Juan Sequeda > +1-575-SEQ-UEDA > www.juansequeda.com > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > > > I committed three quick revisions to capture the input from today's > > meeting. Please review. > > > > Revision 1.27 2010/05/04 17:31:52 eric > > ~ followed MacTed's categorization advice > > > > Revision 1.26 2010/05/04 17:19:20 eric > > ~ s/functional requirements/core requirements/ > > > > Revision 1.25 2010/05/04 17:16:03 eric > > ~ don't presume a mapping from the direct graph > > > > That last one was to capture Harry's point. > > -- > > -ericP > > > > -- -ericP
Received on Sunday, 9 May 2010 21:49:50 UTC