W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > April 2008

[Bug 5652] Constuctors for union types

From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:07:28 +0000
CC:
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JoJ9c-0000fX-3n@farnsworth.w3.org> 

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5652


nick@cbcl.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #2 from nick@cbcl.co.uk  2008-04-22 14:07 -------
OK. That makes sense.

(We were getting confused as were reading "For every atomic type" as "Any type
which is a subtype of xs:anyAtomicType", which the union types are, but clearly
isn't what is actually being described in 5.4)
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 14:08:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 April 2008 14:08:04 GMT