Back on March 5, you asked some difficult questions in response to my earlier questions about an xpath op namespace [1]. Since I didn't have good answers to your questions, I asked someone else from RIF to help, and Jos de Bruijn kindly did, on March 28 [2]. I understand things get busy, but we expect to proceed to Last Call with this in a matter of weeks. At this point, I expect we'll proceed using "http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-operators" as a namespace for the xpath operators. Your alternative design approaches, while probably viable, do not appear to meet our needs as well as simply picking a namespace name. -- Sandro [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008Mar/0021.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008Mar/0090.htmlReceived on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 15:42:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 April 2008 15:42:07 GMT