[Bug 5652] Constuctors for union types

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5652





------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com  2008-04-22 13:41 -------
(Personal response)

Section 5.4 starts:

"For every atomic type in the static context that is derived from a primitive
type, there is a constructor function..."

A union type is not an atomic type; I think it is quite clear that constructor
functions are not defined for list and union types. It would be nice if they
were, but currently they are not.

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 13:41:53 UTC