http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5652 ------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-04-22 13:41 ------- (Personal response) Section 5.4 starts: "For every atomic type in the static context that is derived from a primitive type, there is a constructor function..." A union type is not an atomic type; I think it is quite clear that constructor functions are not defined for list and union types. It would be nice if they were, but currently they are not.Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 13:41:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 April 2008 13:41:53 GMT