Kay, Michael wrote: > The original comment {qt-2003Dec0117-01}: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Dec/0117.html > > came from Mike Brown. This is the official response from the XSL Working > Group. > > The WG considered that no change was needed to the language > specification, but asked the editor to consider adding a clarifying note > or example. > > In response to the questions: > [...] > The phrase "an attribute whose type is xs:ID" means that the attribute > must have a type annotation that is xs:ID or a type derived by > restriction from xs:ID. As explained in XSLT section 19.2.1, an > attribute node acquires such a type annotation as a result of > validation. > > Could you confirm that you are happy with this explanation? Mostly. It matches the comments initially made in the original thread, but I found your response [1] to my inquiry about XSLT sec. 192.2.2 [2] to be just as enlightening and IMHO equally worthy of inclusion in whatever action is taken. Thanks for the consideration and kind reply. -Mike B. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Dec/0134.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Dec/0129.htmlReceived on Sunday, 25 January 2004 19:04:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:04 GMT