RE: [DM] IBM-DM-101: Consistency of anonymous types names across expression evaluations from Michael Kay on 2004-02-18 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from February 2004)

From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:17:59 -0000
To: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000101c3f5f7$b8635270$6401a8c0@pcukmka>

> 
> Section 2.5
> 
> In the second paragraph, it is unclear how long the 
> implementation-defined 
> anonymous type name must persist.  For instance, if the same query or 
> transformation is evaluated twice, with the same static 
> context each time, 
> must the names used to identify the same anonymous types in each 
> evaluation be consistent.
> 

Since the type names are inaccessible to applications (and hopefully
will remain so), why does it make any difference?

Michael Kay

Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 03:17:16 UTC