W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2004

[XPath] IBM-XP-101: Additional reserved function names in future?

From: Henry Zongaro <zongaro@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:25:53 -0500
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF931BCBE7.4FA321DA-ON85256E3B.005ECE4D-85256E3B.00653EAD@ca.ibm.com>

Section 2

The second paragraph of this section mentions that a function cannot have 
the same name as certain keywords.

Could there be additional reserved function names in the future?  If so, a 
caveat would be appropriate here.  Also, it should be made clear that 
there is never any danger of conflict of QNames that specify runtime data. 
 In other words, only user functions (or perhaps host language functions) 
are in danger of conflict.


Henry Zongaro      Xalan development
IBM SWS Toronto Lab   T/L 969-6044;  Phone +1 905 413-6044
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2004 13:25:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:17 UTC