W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2003

RE: TR/xquery-operators/#func-doc

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:21:29 +0100
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F049E17C1@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org

MK
> The document() function is retained for backwards 
> compatibility, and is
> available only in XSLT.
> 
> Of course it would have been nicer to avoid the situation 
> where two similar
> functions are available to XSLT users. But the alternatives were:
> 
> (a) imposing the historical baggage of the document() 
> function on XQuery
> users

The fact that it is and has been very useful for XSLT users makes
it not an item to be considered in terms of backwards compatibility only.

>The doc() function will be available in all three languages, XPath 2.0,
XSLT
>2.0, and XQuery 1.0.

So the xslt users get 'the baggage' of duplicate functions
from xquery then? 
  Sounds pretty biassed to me.

I'd request that the WG resolve this anomoly.

regards DaveP.


** snip here ***

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Monday, 19 May 2003 06:22:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:24 GMT