In a message dated 06/05/2003 17:21:45 GMT Daylight Time, mrys@microsoft.com writes: > I think some editorial rewording may solve it. What about: > > An item $x is identical to a singleton sequence containing that item in > the sense that $x = ((), $x). Michael, If the phrase "is identical" (which for me is an absolute term) was replaced then the seeming inconsistency would, I think, be resolved. In your suggested solution replacing "is identical" with "is equivalent" (or something similar) would satisfy me. I am happy to leave it to the WG to tidy this up. Regards Andrew WattReceived on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 12:32:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:14:24 GMT