Re: EPUB and ISO

Leonard,

 I spoke with the secretariat of SC34 several  times about this topic. If
Korea  submits 3.0.1 as fast tracked DISs, no rewriting is required.  The
interpretation  of the secretariat matters in JTC1.  It is the only
authoritative interpretation.

2018年5月16日(水) 15:55 Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>:

> I am sitting in the JWG7 meeting in Lisbon discussing moving EPUB 3.0.1
> forward as an ISO IS (international standard) as requested by this group
> (and others).  After reviewing tdirectives, we have all agreed that not
> only **MUST** the document go forward as an IS (fast -due to the current
> TS having expired!), but in order to do so it **MUST** be reformatted to
> ISO specs.
>
>
>
> I know that this group felt strongly that if that was required, that
> perhaps the work should take place with 3.1 instead of 3.0.1.  is that
> still the case?  Can I speak to the committee on behalf of the BG (since I
> am a member of the BG)?
>
>
> We  should  absolutely  completely  forget  3.1.  The  successor of 3.0 is
3.2, as agreed  in the  PBG.

Regards,
Makoto

> Also, even if ISO were to move 3.0.1 forward, there are no resources
> available to do the necessary reformatting – which is also blocking things.
>
>
>
> Leonard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>