W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishingbg@w3.org > May 2018

Re: EPUB and ISO

From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 15:12:56 +0000
To: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
CC: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2C0FD742-EEC1-460E-B917-3942F3A66C62@hachette-livre.fr>
Hi Leonard,

Thanks for feedback from Lisbon.

I confirm : EPUB 3.2 is the version to consider.

From Berlin, DPUB Summit

Le 16 mai 2018  16:59, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp<mailto:eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>> a crit :


 I spoke with the secretariat of SC34 several  times about this topic. If Korea  submits 3.0.1 as fast tracked DISs, no rewriting is required.  The interpretation  of the secretariat matters in JTC1.  It is the only  authoritative interpretation.

2018516(ˮ) 15:55 Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com<mailto:lrosenth@adobe.com>>:
I am sitting in the JWG7 meeting in Lisbon discussing moving EPUB 3.0.1 forward as an ISO IS (international standard) as requested by this group (and others).  After reviewing tdirectives, we have all agreed that not only *MUST* the document go forward as an IS (fast -due to the current TS having expired!), but in order to do so it *MUST* be reformatted to ISO specs.

I know that this group felt strongly that if that was required, that perhaps the work should take place with 3.1 instead of 3.0.1.  is that still the case?  Can I speak to the committee on behalf of the BG (since I am a member of the BG)?

We  should  absolutely  completely  forget  3.1.  The  successor of 3.0 is 3.2, as agreed  in the  PBG.

Also, even if ISO were to move 3.0.1 forward, there are no resources available to do the necessary reformatting C which is also blocking things.


Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2018 15:13:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 16 May 2018 15:13:41 UTC