W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishingbg@w3.org > May 2018


From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:55:23 +0000
To: "public-publishingbg@w3.org" <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2D7BB46E-1B11-441F-8228-F5A11BC28FB0@adobe.com>
I am sitting in the JWG7 meeting in Lisbon discussing moving EPUB 3.0.1 forward as an ISO IS (international standard) as requested by this group (and others).  After reviewing the directives, we have all agreed that not only *MUST* the document go forward as an IS (due to the current TS having expired!), but in order to do so it *MUST* be reformatted to ISO specs.

I know that this group felt strongly that if that was required, that perhaps the work should take place with 3.1 instead of 3.0.1.  is that still the case?  Can I speak to the committee on behalf of the BG (since I am a member of the BG)?

Also, even if ISO were to move 3.0.1 forward, there are no resources available to do the necessary reformatting – which is also blocking things.


Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2018 13:55:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 16 May 2018 13:55:52 UTC